Pulley vs. Carta for an Outpatient PT Network's Equity
Outpatient physical therapy networks ask a fairly consistent set of questions once they start consolidating clinics and want to formalize equity for founding therapists and regional directors. Here they are, answered directly.
Most of these questions surface at the same moment: a founding therapist is a few months from closing a deal to join the network, and the parties realize the rollover terms, the state ownership rules, and the platform to track it all were never nailed down in advance.
Vendors Covered in this Article
Disclosure: We may earn a commission if you buy through some links on this page. It doesn't change what we recommend.
Does our state restrict who can own a PT clinic?
It depends on the state. Some states apply corporate-practice-of-medicine-style restrictions to physical therapy ownership, requiring a licensed PT to hold the clinical entity, while others don't restrict it the way they restrict physician-owned practices. A multi-state network needs this confirmed clinic by clinic, since a structure that's fine in one state can be a real problem in another.
Networks that expand by acquisition tend to inherit whatever structure the acquired clinic already had, which isn't always the structure the parent network uses elsewhere. Reconcile any inherited structure against your own standard approach shortly after each acquisition closes, rather than letting inconsistent structures accumulate across the network.
How does a founding therapist's rollover equity work?
When a clinic joins the network, the founding therapist typically takes part cash and part equity in the parent management entity, a rollover meant to keep them invested in the broader network's growth. That rollover stake should be tracked at the management entity level, kept clearly separate from whatever clinical ownership structure your state requires at the individual clinic.
As with any rollover structure, write down what happens if the therapist's own clinic underperforms after joining, or if the therapist leaves clinical practice altogether but keeps their equity. Networks that grow through a steady cadence of acquisitions benefit from a single standard rollover template applied consistently, rather than negotiating each deal's terms from a blank page.
Should a regional clinical director get real equity or phantom equity?
Phantom equity, in almost every case. A regional director overseeing several clinics is a critical retention target, but real equity is typically reserved for someone who actually sold a practice into the network or is taking on real ownership risk. Phantom equity tied to the region's performance rewards the director without diluting founding therapists' or investors' real stakes.
Tie the formula to metrics the director genuinely controls: visit volume, patient retention, and staff turnover across their region, rather than company-wide results that include clinics outside their oversight. A director managing three clinics shouldn't see their payout swing because of a struggling clinic in a different region they have no involvement with.
When does Pulley make sense for a PT network?
Early on, when the network has a small number of founding therapists' rollover stakes and no outside capital yet. Pulley gets a clean cap table set up quickly without a lot of process overhead, which matters most in the first year or two after a network starts consolidating, when the founding team is often doing this work themselves alongside everything else involved in integrating a new clinic.
When does Carta make sense instead?
Once the network has raised outside capital to fund clinic acquisitions, added a board, or is managing rollover equity across enough founding therapists that investor-grade, consolidated reporting becomes necessary rather than optional. That shift usually happens gradually rather than at a single obvious moment, so it's worth checking in on which side of the line you're actually on every time a new acquisition closes.
What triggers a 409A valuation for a PT network?
The first stock option grant with a strike price to a non-founder employee, whether that's a regional director, a VP of clinical operations, or an early corporate hire. Get the valuation before the grant, using a provider who understands how multi-location outpatient services businesses are actually valued, rather than applying a generic SaaS valuation approach to a very different kind of business.
What happens when a founding therapist wants to sell their remaining stake?
Write a defined buyback or transfer mechanism into the original rollover agreement, covering price methodology, timing, and whether the network or its investors have a right of first refusal. Networks that leave this undefined tend to negotiate it for the first time under pressure, when a founding therapist unexpectedly wants liquidity and there's no agreed process to fall back on.
Non-compete and referral relationships tied to a departing director
A regional clinical director's relationships with referring physicians and orthopedic practices are often as valuable as their clinical work, which makes a properly drafted non-solicit and non-compete, reviewed for enforceability in every state the region spans, an important companion to any phantom equity plan. Vesting discourages an early departure financially; the restrictive covenants are what actually protect the referral relationships if that person leaves anyway.
Settle these points before a founding therapist closes a deal to join the network:
- Whether your state requires a licensed PT to own the clinical entity, confirmed clinic by clinic for multi-state networks.
- How rollover equity is held at the management entity level, kept separate from any clinical ownership.
- A defined buyback or transfer mechanism covering price methodology, timing, and any right of first refusal.
- Phantom equity for regional directors tied to the aggregate performance of the region they oversee.
- A non-solicit and non-compete reviewed for enforceability in every state the region spans, plus a 409A valuation before the first option grant.
What Good Looks Like
Good equity accounting for a PT network means every founding therapist's rollover stake and every regional director's phantom equity grant has a signed agreement, clinical entity ownership matches state requirements, and the network can produce a clean, consolidated ownership picture as it adds clinics.
Building The Capability (5-Stage Skill Ladder)
How to Get Started
Disclosure: We may earn a commission if you buy through some links on this page. It doesn't change what we recommend.
Pulley fits an early-stage PT network with a small number of founding therapists' rollover stakes and no outside capital yet.
Carta fits a PT network that's raised outside capital or is managing rollover equity across enough founding therapists to need investor-grade, consolidated reporting.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do we need separate ownership records for each clinic?
You need the clinical entity's ownership structured to match your state's rules, kept separate from the management company's cap table, which is where founding therapist rollover equity and any phantom equity plans actually live.
Can a regional director's phantom equity span multiple clinics?
Yes, and it typically should, tied to the aggregate performance of the region they oversee rather than any single clinic, so the incentive matches their actual scope of responsibility.
How do we handle equity when a founding therapist eventually retires?
That should be addressed in the original rollover agreement, ideally with a defined buyback or transfer mechanism, so the network isn't negotiating the terms for the first time the moment someone actually wants to retire.
About the numbers
This guide doesn't quote a sourced benchmark. Figures in it are estimates or general guidance, so check them against your own numbers.
Related Guides
409A Valuation for an Outpatient Physical Therapy Network
Reimbursement cuts and referral concentration both move an outpatient PT network's 409A faster than most operational fixes can offset. Here's how to prepare.
BILL vs Tipalti for Outpatient Physical Therapy Networks
A worked example shows how BILL and Tipalti fit clinic-level supply orders, equipment leases and referral vendor pay at PT networks.
Payroll for an Outpatient PT Network: Productivity Pay and Licensure
How an outpatient physical therapy network handles productivity pay, multi-state licensure, and per-clinic labor cost, and where Gusto and Rippling diverge.
FloQast vs. AuditBoard for Multi-Clinic Physical Therapy Networks
Contracted payer rates, visit-based billing, and claim denials complicate a physical therapy network's close. See how FloQast and AuditBoard fit.
Cube vs. Mosaic for an Outpatient PT Network's Unit Billing
A decision guide for Cube versus Mosaic when an outpatient physical therapy network needs to forecast off billed units and therapist utilization.
Building a Payee Dedup Worksheet for PT Networks
A worksheet approach for outpatient physical therapy networks to deduplicate PRN therapist pay before filing 1099s with Tax1099 or Track1099.