Quick Ratio vs Cash Ratio: Building Both Yourself in Ten Minutes
The current ratio gets taught first, but it's the loosest of the common liquidity measures, since it counts inventory and prepaid expenses as if they were as available as cash. The quick ratio and the cash ratio strip that out, in two different ways, and the gap between what each one tells you is where the useful information actually lives.
You don't need a finance background or specialized software to build either of these from your own balance sheet. You need about ten minutes and a clear sense of which of your current assets you'd actually be able to convert to cash inside a short window if you genuinely needed to.
Vendors Covered in this Article
Disclosure: We may earn a commission if you buy through some links on this page. It doesn't change what we recommend.
What the Quick Ratio Actually Excludes
The quick ratio takes your current assets and removes inventory and prepaid expenses before dividing by current liabilities, on the logic that inventory has to be sold first and prepaid expenses were never going to convert back to cash at all. What's left is cash, marketable securities, and receivables, the assets that are either already liquid or one collection cycle away from it. This makes the quick ratio a meaningfully more honest picture than the current ratio for any business holding real inventory, since inventory sitting on a shelf isn't paying next month's bills no matter what the balance sheet says it's worth.
What the Cash Ratio Strips Out That the Quick Ratio Still Counts
The cash ratio goes one step further and removes receivables too, leaving only cash and cash equivalents divided by current liabilities. This answers a narrower, blunter question: if every current liability came due today and not one customer paid you in time, could you cover it with cash alone. It's a harsher test than the quick ratio, and most healthy businesses run a cash ratio well below one, since holding enough pure cash to cover every current liability outright is expensive and usually unnecessary.
Building Both From Your Own Balance Sheet
Pull your most recent balance sheet and start with total current assets. Subtract inventory and prepaid expenses to get your quick assets, then divide by current liabilities for the quick ratio. Then subtract receivables from that same quick asset figure to get to cash and equivalents alone, and divide by current liabilities again for the cash ratio. Doing this by hand once, rather than pulling it from a dashboard, forces you to actually look at what's inside each line item, which is often more useful than the ratio itself.
Build both ratios from your latest balance sheet in these steps:
- Pull your most recent balance sheet and write down the total current assets figure to start from.
- Subtract inventory and prepaid expenses from current assets, and the remainder is your quick assets figure.
- Divide those quick assets by total current liabilities, and the result is your quick ratio.
- Subtract receivables from quick assets to leave cash and cash equivalents only.
- Divide that cash figure by current liabilities to get the cash ratio.
Why the Gap Between the Two Ratios Matters More Than Either Number Alone
A quick ratio that looks solid while the cash ratio looks thin tells you your near-term liquidity depends heavily on collecting receivables on schedule. That's a very different risk profile from a business where both ratios sit close together, which means liquidity doesn't depend much on collections timing at all. Track the gap between the two over time, not just each ratio in isolation, since a widening gap is often the earliest sign that receivables are slowing down before it shows up anywhere else in your reporting.
When Each Ratio Actually Gets Used
Lenders and landlords reviewing a credit application often care more about the quick ratio, since it reflects a realistic near-term liquidity picture without being as punishing as the cash ratio. A board or a founder stress-testing a genuine worst case, a sudden stop in collections, gets more value from the cash ratio, since it answers the harsher question directly. Neither one replaces an actual cash flow forecast; both are a fast gut check you can run from a balance sheet you already have in front of you.
A Simple Habit That Makes Both Ratios More Useful
Calculate both ratios on the same day each month, right after your books close, rather than pulling them occasionally when someone asks. A ratio calculated inconsistently, sometimes mid-month, sometimes right after a large payment run, tells you less than a ratio tracked on a fixed schedule, since timing noise inside a single month can move either number more than any real change in your underlying liquidity did. Consistency in when you calculate it matters almost as much as the calculation itself.
What Good Looks Like
Good short-term liquidity discipline means knowing your quick ratio and cash ratio, and the trend in the gap between them, well enough to explain a change in either one without pulling up the balance sheet first.
Building The Capability (5-Stage Skill Ladder)
How to Get Started
Disclosure: We may earn a commission if you buy through some links on this page. It doesn't change what we recommend.
Frequently Asked Questions
What's a good quick ratio for a small or mid-sized company?
There's no single universal number, since it depends heavily on your industry and how predictable your receivables collection actually is. A ratio comfortably above one is generally viewed as healthy across most industries, but the more useful exercise is tracking your own ratio's trend over time rather than chasing a benchmark that may not fit your specific business.
Why would a company intentionally keep a low cash ratio?
Holding a large cash balance purely to keep the cash ratio high has a real opportunity cost, since that cash isn't being invested in the business or earning a meaningful return sitting idle. Most well-run companies keep enough cash to cover near-term obligations comfortably and put the rest to work, accepting a cash ratio below one as a normal and reasonable tradeoff.
Should these ratios include restricted cash, like a reserve account?
No. Restricted cash you don't actually control the timing of, such as a lender-held reserve account, shouldn't be counted as available liquidity in either ratio, even though it appears as cash on the balance sheet. Including it overstates your real near-term flexibility and defeats the purpose of calculating the ratio in the first place.
About the numbers
This guide doesn't quote a sourced benchmark. Figures in it are estimates or general guidance, so check them against your own numbers.
Related Guides
Bond Ladders or Money Market Funds for Reserve Cash
How a short-term Treasury bond ladder compares to a government money market fund for corporate reserve cash, and which fits which part of your balance.
Why Liquidity Crunches Hit Hardest During Hyper-Growth
Why fast growth creates its own cash timing gap, the one ratio worth tracking weekly, and what to do first once the gap starts widening.
Writing a Treasury Policy Once Reserves Cross Eight Figures
A practical structure for the board-approved treasury policy most companies write once cash reserves reach eight figures, and the tradeoffs to settle on paper.
Earning Yield on Venture Debt Cash Without Tripping Covenants
How to earn a return on venture debt cash sitting on your balance sheet without violating the negative covenants most venture debt agreements include.
Kyriba, Coupa Treasury, or Trovata: How to Choose a Treasury System
A practical framework for deciding between Kyriba, Coupa Treasury, and Trovata, and for knowing when a full TMS is overkill for your treasury team.
What a Series B Treasury Audit Actually Checks
The specific documents and controls a treasury audit checks at Series B, and how to prepare so the review doesn't surface gaps you could have fixed earlier.